“When he had his period, he wondered if he should revert to the girls’ bathroom because there was no place to throw away his used tampons.” “There were practical issues,” Anemona Hartocollis writes. Jackson, a transgender female, who attends a Vermont high school. The New York Times recently reported about A.J. We listen to science and logic, yet, we are called science deniers.īasic biology says that women go through menstruation. We also believe that if we found a single cell organism on Mars, every headline on Earth for the next week would be “Life Found on Mars”! But when we find a fully formed human child breathing and moving in a woman’s womb, we dismiss it as simply a polyp. We vile republicans believe that ending the life of a human being that can live outside the womb is murder. The Republican party stands firm in that when new DNA is created inside of a woman and it can, based off of numerous scientific studies, survive outside of the womb at the age of 22 weeks. Stating that we as a society should throw out basic biology, and allow people to subjectively choose their sex, gender, and race based on some delusion in their head, is a belief of the progressive left. We believe that depending on your X or Y chromosomes inside your body, you are created as a male or a female. The Republican party majoritively believes that basic biology should be the basis for sex and gender. Now, even if we Republicans do not stand completely in line with climate “science”, we do not deny biology, psychology, or science as a whole! If we move through what has been described as “science” over the past decade, it will become erroneously clear that the Democratic party, not the Republicans, are the party of science-deniers. Wikipedia even describes the group of people who do not fully agree to these terms as aĪnd describes people who outspokenly question the science as “a campaign to undermine public trust in…science” For questioning “sure-fire” science, Republicans have been smeared and lied about. Anyone who spoke out criticizing the accord, or did not agree that making America stunt its economy to contribute to ending the real climate problem, China, or questioning that these “climate scientists” were perfect at their art, were ridiculed. The world joined together, then, to criticize any person, party, or group who then did not agree 100% with this deal. When presented with the humanitarian crisis of climate change, Barack Obama joined the Paris Climate Accord in accordance with the UN to work together as a human race to reduce carbon emissions and make a change in our dying world. Although we do love our environment and agree that we would not be able to advance in society if we burned our forests to the ground, we disagree with the solution to many longstanding problems. The opinion of millions of Americans is that the human race does have an effect on our climate, we are the leading cause of climate change, and we should watch our carbon emissions. Do we on the political right deny science, or does the political left merely use the term “science” as a selective cudgel only when it benefits them?Īs an individual who believes that it is common sense that the human race does have an effect on the climate of the planet, it dumbfounds me to hear that I am a science denier.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |